For the backgrounder to this article, you’re welcome to read all about the magical performance by Victoria Police at Geelong recently, in making a female victim of crime disappear.

Not once, but 4 times over!

And then you can sit in amazement along with myself as to why that same female non-victim today received a letter in the mail from the Geelong Magistrates Court, informing her of the outcome of the case, that same case that police completely fucking deleted her from.

I’ve been forced to censor the letter because a failure to do so would both breach my current conditions of bail, and further upset the stalking, psychopathic piece of shit police opted to protect by taking the corrupt course of actions they did.

‘

I am fully aware of how IT systems work, and how databases can spit out form letters erroneously, and how this letter above may have arrived by sheer accident… but riddle me this police…

That female victim either exists, or she doesn’t?

Because according to the courts very own IT system, the disappearing female victim is in line to be informed of the case outcome, as of this week, as per the letter above, yet corrupt police activities ensured every effort possible was made to remove her from ever being a victim.

Let me guess… police can only manipulate their own IT system?

Got it.

That female non-victim/reappearing victim isn’t willing to provide a response to the very upsetting, very insensitive and hurtful communication that arrived in her mailbox today, choosing to just move on with her new life of constant anxiety attacks, fear of living in her own home she’s resided in for the past 10 years without incident, and further harassment via the legal process since, by the same self confessed sexual predator police have corruptly assisted.

Perhaps it was all just one big mistake?

The following disturbing case studies have been sourced from the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) report published in December 2015, titled Predatory behaviour by Victoria Police officers against vulnerable persons.

Buckle up ladies, for your own safety!

The boss won’t tolerate it!

“The PSC investigated allegations that a male officer had sexually assaulted a female victim of family violence whom he met in the course of his duties.

During the investigation, numerous female police officers came forward and stated that over the course of several years they too had been subject to sexual harassment and sexual assault by the officer.

Some colleagues had reported the officer’s conduct to their superiors but no action was taken.

The investigation also identified that the officer had frequently misused the police Law Enforcement Assistance Program (LEAP) database to access the personal details of women he had met in the course of his duties to pursue for sexual relationships.

The officer would usually contact the women via telephone or using his police email account.

Some of the women were particularly vulnerable due to mental health issues or being victims of family violence.

The officer was charged with numerous discipline offences and faced dismissal but resigned under investigation prior to a police discipline hearing.

The Office of Public Prosecutions had earlier determined there was insufficient evidence to support the prospect of criminal convictions.

The investigation also found that supervisors at the police station had failed in their duty to manage the performance and conduct of the officer and follow up on the complaints of female colleagues.”

Don’t drink and drive!

“A police officer was subject to a complaint alleging that while on-duty he sexually assaulted two intoxicated females he had offered to drive home from a bar.

The officer had previously been subject to complaints regarding his sexualised behaviour.

This included alleged on-duty visits to brothels and the alleged theft of seized pornographic material from a police station.

An audit of the officer’s LEAP database access identified he had conducted a disproportionate number of checks on female members of the public.

PSC investigators were unable to locate any official documentation to support the checks being conducted for legitimate law enforcement purposes.

The officer subsequently retired under investigation and discipline and/or criminal charges against him were not pursued.”

Even the mentally ill aren’t safe!

“Police arrested an 18-year-old woman under the Mental Health Act.

As a child, the woman had a troubled upbringing and had frequent contact with police and social services.

Prior police records stated that owing to her traumatic past she was at ‘high risk of sexual/emotional exploitation’.

Following her arrest, a male police officer accompanied her to hospital for assessment.

Get an intervention order they said!

“A male officer assisted a female complainant obtain an intervention order following a family violence incident.

The officer later met the woman socially and an ongoing sexual relationship commenced.

During their relationship the woman had continual involvements with police in relation to family violence incidents.

The officer was spoken to several times by senior officers about his relationship with the woman but denied any existed.

On further questioning he eventually admitted the nature of his relationship with the woman.

As he was still subject to probation, the officer was referred to the Police Academy for a hearing to determine his suitability to remain in Victoria Police.

At the hearing the presiding officer determined that the officer fully understood the consequences of his actions and could still be a valuable member of Victoria Police.

His probationary period was extended and he was transferred to another station.

Some time later the officer took a report from another woman alleging she had been the victim of a family violence-related assault.

Following this, the officer commenced a sexual relationship with the woman.

After several weeks the officer ended the relationship and the woman attempted self-harm.

The matter was reported to PSC.

When interviewed by investigators the officer admitted to the relationship but believed it to be appropriate.

As he was still subject to probation he was directed to attend another hearing at the Police Academy to determine his employment suitability.

Prior to the hearing he submitted his resignation.

If at first you don’t succeed…

“After multiple attempts at joining, a male was accepted as a Victoria Police recruit.

He had been rejected on previous occasions owing to concerns regarding his suitability.

Throughout his police career he was subject to numerous allegations – many of which were substantiated – regarding obsessive and stalking behaviours towards female police colleagues he had been in relationships with, and his behaviour toward vulnerable females he met through his police duties.

He faced a court hearing and multiple discipline hearings but was not dismissed from the force.

The officer was eventually charged with criminal offences related to a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old female he had arrested.

The charges were eventually withdrawn and the officer resigned from Victoria Police while under investigation, avoiding further discipline proceedings.”

Sex, drugs, and 8 years in the hole!

“A former police officer was sentenced in the County Court to eight years and seven months’ imprisonment in relation to a series of misconduct, sexual and drug offences.

The officer was convicted of misconduct in public office after having sex with a woman whose home he had attended following family concerns for her welfare.

The woman later stated that she only acceded to the officer’s advances because he was a police officer and she felt she had to.

The woman later made a complaint about the officer to PSC.

Around the same time, PSC received several other complaints against the officer including alleged rape and drug offences.

Subsequently an investigation was commenced.

The investigation uncovered further allegations of sexual assault and criminal behaviour by the officer.

He was eventually charged with criminal offences including multiple counts of rape, misconduct in public office, bribery, drug possession and drug trafficking.

He was convicted of one count of rape; two counts of misconduct in public office and pleaded guilty to several drug charges.

In sentencing the officer to imprisonment, the judge commented that the case was ‘a criminal dereliction of your duty as a police officer to act towards a vulnerable person, with whom you first came in contact in your role as a police officer, with sensitivity and understanding, and not to abuse your power to take advantage of her, forcing her by your position of power to accede to your wishes for sexual activity’.

The officer unsuccessfully appealed his conviction and sentence to the Supreme and High Courts.”

 

Goddamn!

And those are matters that were actually reported… and actually investigated.

Spare a thought for the many you possibly never hear about!